It is an unfortunate fact of our
existence as Blacks that African contribution to human history has been and is
being actively negated by the drivers of current civilization. Eurocentrism that
neatly carved out every other race from any contribution to human development has
had to grudgingly accept the role of Asians and Arabs in the development of
human history. This reluctant acceptance stems not only from scholar and historical
evidence, but from the current development level of these States. But not so
for Africans. The adoption of the languages of colonialists as official
languages of African States, the espousal of their religions, the embrace of
the political and economic models have further convinced Eurocentrists that
Africans had nothing to be proud of before they set their feet on our soil.
Even when confronted with contrary evidence as was provided by Cheick Anta Diop,
these Eurocentrists backed by their governments go to extreme lengths of
historical distortion and manipulation to not only deny any African role in
human development but also to demonize the purveyor of such ideas.
Georges Curvier, a French biologist, once wrote,
“The African manifestly approaches the monkey tribe. The hordes of which this
variety is composed have always remained in a complete state of barbarism…”.
America’s Thomas Jefferson also shared this position and said, “...I advance it
therefore as a suspicion only that the blacks whether originally a distinct
race or made distinct by time and circumstances, are inferior to the whites in
the endowments of the mind and body…" Georg Wilhem Hegel in his Philosophy
of History, said this of Black Africans: "….their condition is capable
of no development of culture, and as we see them at this day, such they have
always been..." The Vatican, through Pope Julius II after having declared
at the beginning of 16th century (1512) that Indians in South
America could be considered the sons and daughters of Adam and thus could not
be enslaved, but that Black Africans could be enslaved as they were not of Adam
and Eve, recanted in 18th century by advancing the doctrine that
indeed, Africans could also be considered as children of Adam and Eve, but that
they were the accursed sons of Ham (Genesis 9: 18-27). Africans came and
continue to be viewed as objects of history. Any role of Black Africans as
agents of history is either actively negated (and backed by “research”) or
given a Eurocentric twist when physical facts make induced amnesia impossible.
Nicholas Sarkozy, the French president put the Eurocentric
cards on the table for the Africans to see when he declared on 26th
July 2007, in a speech in Dakar, Senegal that “The tragedy of Africa is that
the African has not fully entered into history. The African peasant, who for
thousands of years has lived according to the seasons, whose life ideal was to
be in harmony with nature, only knew the eternal renewal of time, rhythmed by
the endless repetition of the same gestures and the same words. In this imaginary
world where everything starts over and over again there is no place for human
adventure or for the idea of progress. This man (the traditional African) never
launched himself towards the future. The idea never came to him to get out of
this repetition and to invent his own destiny. … Africa’s
challenge is to enter to a greater extent into history. Africa…is to realise
that the golden age that Africa is forever
recalling will not return because it has never existed.”
But we, Africans know that we have always
contributed to human history. We have been contributing since Man came out of
the Rift Valley. We know that as each day passes, we contribute as individuals
and as groups to human development. We contribute through their language and
culture to human development. More importantly and unknown to them is our
contribution to all aspects of human endeavor through our language, arts, culture and knowledge.
Eurocentrists have always claimed that our
history is oral that has no value as human memory fails over centuries, but we
know that in addition to oral we have monuments (the pyramids), we have written
evidence, (the hieroglyphs), and we gave the world the concept of monotheism years
before Moses (Akhenaten, whose life resembles ours – “after
his death, his monuments were dismantled and hidden, his statues were
destroyed, and his name excluded from the king lists”).
Like other civilizations before it, this current
civilization will also elcipse out either as a natural phenomenon beyond human
knowledge or more likely as a result of destruction of the planet by humans.
Whichever way it happens, we will be history someday.
Yesterday, I read a very interesting story about
Martin Kunze, an Austrian, who has developed a unique way of storing knowledge
for the future on ceramic tiles in the oldest salt-mine in the world. The initiative
is called “Memory of Mankind” (MOM), and it accepts texts, music, cultural
events, personal stories, books, blogs for storage. It is a storage designed to
transmit who and what we are now to those who will come behind us (here on this
planet if it exists or from outer space).
Africans must be present in the future; so I am
appealing to all my readers who write, sing, produce any form of art or science
to take this opportunity and store your materials for the future. I do not know
Martin, but I am really fascinated by his idea. You can read more about MOM on www.memory-of-mankind.com
I want my books, this article you are reading
now, as well as my entire blog to be read by the creatures of the future 500,
000 years from now.
4 comments:
Nicely put! It was so easy for the oyinbos to write off what we had and substitute theirs because there was no written form of our language when they arrived. Coupled with this was the attitude of first blacks to receive western education. The Arabs were better positioned because their language was in a written form hence they escaped being conquered and captured by the colonialists. Thank you for this master piece on how the blacks were viewed and still largely viewed even by the church!
Profound, paradigm shifting, and action provoking. Thank you Sir.
Well researched and thought provoking write up. I have always believed that the negative reviews on Africans is basically an attempt to appear supperior to Africans. For example the nose of the sphnix was blown off because it is African shaped. We Africans should write our own history whether it pleases them or not. Afterall the most abused discipline in knowledge-world is history.
C'est vrai... Toutes vos publications, tous vos écrits, qui sont un label, méritent amplement d'être protégés, pour la postérité.
Vos productions ont le mérite de nous replonger dans l'histoire de notre Afrique et de nous (jeunes africains) réveiller de l'hypnose.
Thank you Dr LAGUNJU .
Post a Comment