Recently during the Rio Olympics, Mr Ryan Lochte, a much decorated
US swimmer attempted to smear the credibility of a whole nation. He invented a
story that never happened and sought the interface of the misrepresenting
violent stereotype of the host nation to pass his fiction for truth. In his
warped narrative, he, the aggressor transformed himself into a victim of a
crime in which he was the villain and not the victim. His dummy story was read all over the world. Some,
who read the story shrugged their shoulders and with the misguided stereotype
in mind, thought, “It’s Brazil anyway, that is a non-story. It is normal. Very
high crime rate.” Some others were horrified that an Olympian, particularly a
high profile one had been subjected to such a horrendous crime. The Brazilian
people and the authorities were disappointed and unhappy. They did not want the Rio Olympics to be
remembered by any crime that happened during the games. They wanted the event
to be remembered as a joyful gathering of world’s best athletes and into which
painstaking planning and resources had been invested.
They sought to know more about what really happened to Ryan Lochte.
Their investigations took the veil away from Mr. Lochte’s story. Ryan had told
a barefaced white lie. Rather than being a victim, he was the aggressor. The technology
of closed circuit television unraveled his lies. The Brazilians did not waste
time to expose the pitiful liar that wanted to sacrifice their national integrity
for his own ego.
According to news reports of what really transpired, Ryan had gone out in
the company of three other swimmer-colleagues allegedly to the French camp and
had partied all night. In his own words he was drunk. On their way back from
the party in the early hours of the next day, they stopped at a petrol station
so the camaradas could use the loo.
The door of the toilet was locked. In a drunken rage or perhaps because of his
grandiose delusion, he broke down the toilet door. The petrol station guards
challenged his behavior and told him he had to pay for the damages. He raged
and it took a gun drawn by one of the guards to calm him down. He was told to
sit on the floor like any common criminal. After a while, he paid for the
damages and left with his colleagues back to their camp. But Mr. Lochte could
not live with his ego battered. He had to change the story. He would rather
have the image and honour of the host country damaged than his ego. He invented
a story of armed robbery in which he was the victim. But the hosts would not have that. They undid
Ryan Lochte. The Brazilians deserve an extra gold medal for protecting their
integrity and self-esteem.
Had this happened in any country in Africa, Mr Lochte would have escaped
with his lie. The host country would have been browbeaten into shameful
submission and admission of guilt. The world press would have gone into frenzy
to further damage the African State. It would have been thought inconceivable
that someone of Mr. Lochte’s status could tell a blatant lie. Warped statistics
would have been rolled out by western pundits to back Mr. Lochte’s lie. And no
one, no one would have believed the African authorities if they attempted to
counter Ryan’s lies with contrary evidence.
The Rio story brings to fore the different historical lies that have
been told against the African and which have formed the basis of stereotyping
of Black people by other races. Here are some of the lies:
Georges Curvier, a French biologist, once wrote in his book, The
Animal Kingdom, (1827-35), that “The African manifestly approaches the
monkey tribe. The hordes of which this variety is composed have always remained
in a complete state of barbarism…”. America’s Thomas Jefferson also shared this
position and said, “...I advance it therefore as a suspicion only that the
blacks whether originally a distinct race or made distinct by time and
circumstances, are inferior to the whites in the endowments of the mind and
body…" Georg Wilhem Hegel in his Philosophy of History, said this
of Black Africans: "….their condition is capable of no development of
culture, and as we see them at this day, such they have always been..."
The Vatican, through Pope Julius II after having declared at the beginning of
16th century (1512) that Indians in South America could be considered
the sons and daughters of Adam and thus could not be enslaved, but that Black
Africans could be enslaved as they were not of Adam and Eve, recanted in 18th
century by advancing the doctrine that indeed, Africans could also be
considered as children of Adam and Eve, but that they were the accursed sons of
Ham (Genesis 9: 18-27). Britain’s Lord Milner also had this to say of early South African
politics: “A political equality of white and black is impossible, the white man
must rule because he is elevated by many, many steps above the black man.” (Martin Meredith: Nelson Mandela, A Biography. Penguin
Books 1997) Frantz
Fanon in his book, The Wretched of the Earth made reference to one Dr.
Carothers of the WHO, who in the 1950’s opined that, a “black man is equivalent
to a lobotomized white man.” As recently as July 2007, Nicholas Sarkozy the
former president of France in a speech in Dakar, Senegal practically
diagnosed schizophrenia in Black Africans when he accused Africans of
remembering what never happened in their history. He said, “The tragedy of
Africa is that the African has not fully entered into history. … Africa’s
challenge is to enter to a greater extent into history. Africa…is to realise
that the golden age that Africa is forever recalling will not return because it
has never existed.” These lies have
stereotyped the African and the Black race as an accidental beneficiary and
object of history rather than an active contributor to and participant in human
history. And these lies continue in different forms – in statistics of dubious
origin, in generalization of oddities by the western press and in deliberate
omission of historical and contemporary achievements of Black Africans.
The US Olympic Committee quickly apologized for the behaviour of Ryan
and his three colleagues and declared that "The behaviour of these athletes is not
acceptable, nor does it represent the values of Team USA or the conduct of the
vast majority of its members." Some of Lochte’s sponsors, ashamed of their
business partner, have withdrawn their sponsorship. Mr. Ryan Lochte is in
disgrace.
Had the
Brazilians not put their brain and resources to prove that the story of Ryan
was a mere fabrication, the whole world would have, in their minds equated the
beautiful and well planned Rio Olympics to armed robbery.
Black Africans
have the obligation, like the Brazilians did, to provide evidence that the
historical lies told against the black race are simply white lies. Like in the
case of Ryan Lochte, these lies are fabrications of the vilest minds. These
lies do not in any way represent us. Our indifference will not make these lies
to go away. We need to shame the liars in a concerted way.
2 comments:
Nice composition sir...
The problem we have in Africa is that we are too busy chasing the basic needs of life that are supposed to come normally with ease even with struggle, sorrow, tears and blood... So, how will they have the time for whatever lies the white people and other races would have cooked against them and their race. Moreover, does an average African have the time to read books? They say a rolling stone gathers no moss... And that is why they also say if anyone wants to keep a secret from African, he should put it in the books. They may never even know that lies have been written about them and already in the public domain of other races who read books but unknown to the Negros because they don't read books.
Maybe when their orientation change but I doubt if it will ever happen with the kind of rulers that are in place in different countries of the continent. The Bible quotation you gave in the article may be right afterall, Africa seems like a cursed land and race. It is so clear when the situation is the same all over without an exception. Only GOD can change this situation that Africa has found herself... Maybe, truly, we were created by design to be inferior and will continue to serve the whites and other races till the end of the world... I repeat again, "Only GOD" can change this...
GOD bless...
Thank you very much for the invitation to read your essays and in particular for this piece. I hope to have time to contribute thoughts to this all important debate--are blacks inferior to whites and other races or not? My general view or understanding is that so many issues are at stake in this kind of discussion--genomics, geography, culture, the invisible finger of God, etc. Published findings from human genome studies have pointed out that all homo sapiens have about 99.6% of their genes the same. So on the structural or make up level we are all alike. The differences begin to show with varied expression of the genes. However, just as there are inferior blacks are inferior whites or mongoloids or other races for that matter. Have you not noticed that even amongst whites there are shades or variations of whiteness in skins, ditto for blacks? I want to submit for now that geography, especially the beautiful environmental conditions most blacks find themselves, must have made blacks generally intellectually lazier than other races. From that alone, other conditions arise--inability to modernize lives with technology, inability to compete favorably for a proportionate share of global resources, inability to contribute meaningfully through great personalities to human history and discourse, etc. In conclusion for now, I want to submit that once as a people we chose to rise above all these limitations we can surely be at par with the best of races in the world. Never mind abuses thrown our way, as even in Western Europe, the English for example believe they are superior to Germans or the French--a people who once colonized them and subjected them to various forms of indignity. The Russians too, in eastern or continental Europe, believe the peoples of the former Soviet states are lesser humans until those ones rose against them and variously got their full independence. We can go on and on but the bottom line is all homo sapiens are just being true to biology and nature--competing for apparently limited resources to survive and thus adopting or using whatever weapons of battle available, including some psychological ones which you copiously referred to.
Post a Comment